The imposition of a 20% withholding tax on dividends and 15% on interest for non-residents directly affects the profitability of cross-border investments. Yet, through diligent tax planning and leveraging DTAs, these rates can be reduced, provided there is strict compliance with local regulations and adherence to obtaining tax residency certificates. Effective planning not only ensures the repatriation of profits efficiently, but often underpins the overall tax efficiency and viability of cross-border M&A deals.

​

Balancing Debt and Equity Under Thin Capitalisation Rules

In M&A, debt financing is often favoured, particularly when dealing with capital-intensive targets. However, South Africa’s thin capitalisation rules impose limits on interest deductions from related-party loans, which can skew the financing structures in M&A deals. Too much debt relative to equity can lead to disallowed tax deductions, increasing taxable income. Therefore, a balance between debt and equity is necessary to leverage tax benefits while staying within regulatory bounds. This involves navigating through sections like 23M, which specifically limits interest deductions for cross-border loans between connected persons, and understanding the impact of local borrowing restrictions for affected persons whose shares are held by exchange control non-residents.

 

Unlocking Roll-over Relief in Group Restructurings

Sections 43 to 47 of the Income Tax Act offer opportunities for tax deferral in corporate reorganisations or share transfers, which can be particularly advantageous for managing cash flow during M&A integration. However, these benefits come with stringent anti-avoidance provisions, necessitating careful planning to ensure eligibility. Roll-over relief can significantly enhance financial flexibility during group restructurings, but compliance with eligibility criteria is paramount to avoid unexpected tax liabilities.

 

Share Swaps and Anti-Avoidance in Section 42 Transactions

Section 42 of the Income Tax Act allows for tax deferral in asset-for-share transactions, which is a boon for M&A strategies. However, this comes with its own set of anti-avoidance measures to prevent abuse. The timing of transactions is crucial; selling shares within 18 months of such a swap can reverse the tax benefits. Moreover, the assumption of liabilities in share swaps can lead to deferred tax liabilities that might materialise upon exit, requiring careful long-term planning to manage future tax implications.

 

Transfer Pricing Compliance in Cross-Border M&A

Transfer pricing remains a critical area of focus in cross-border M&A, where transactions between related parties must adhere to arm’s length principles. Comprehensive documentation and pricing strategies are essential to avoid penalties and adjustments. Post-acquisition, aligning intercompany transactions to support business operations while ensuring compliance is key to minimising tax risks.

 

Mitigating Permanent Establishment (PE) Risk in Cross-Border Deals

Foreign investors must be wary of inadvertently creating a permanent establishment in South Africa, which would trigger local tax obligations. Structuring investments through local subsidiaries can provide a shield against PE risks, while maintaining control and tax efficiency.

 

Balancing BEE Ownership Compliance with Tax Efficiency

Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) ownership compliance is not just about meeting regulatory requirements, but is crucial for operational success in South Africa. Structuring transactions to align with BEE ownership requirements while ensuring tax efficiency involves navigating complex rules to minimise tax penalties while maximising business outcomes. This requires a nuanced understanding of how B-BBEE ownership impacts can be integrated into tax planning strategies to enhance the overall value of M&A transactions.

 

Recent Judicial Developments Impacting M&A Tax Strategy

Recent court decisions have been centred around the interpretation of the FBE exemption in South African tax law. One example is the Coronation FBE (foreign business establishment) case, a significant tax dispute between Coronation Investment Management SA (Pty) Ltd and the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (SARS), which has clarified aspects of tax exemptions for foreign subsidiaries, providing clearer pathways for tax-efficient structuring in international operations.

 

Conversely, the Thistle Trust Case is a landmark judicial decision concerning the taxation of trusts, particularly involving capital gains in multi-tiered trust structures. The case addressed how capital gains are taxed when distributed through multiple tiers of trusts, specifically focusing on the application of the “conduit principle” in tax law. The ruling has tightened the rules around the conduit principle in trusts, impacting how capital gains are managed in M&A, necessitating a reassessment of trust structures.

 

Conclusion: A Proactive Tax Strategy for M&A Success

As South Africa’s tax environment becomes more intricate, proactive and strategic tax planning is vital for M&A and corporate activity success. By understanding and adapting to these evolving tax trends and regulatory shifts, both local and international investors can navigate the complexities, unlock greater value, and achieve sustained success in this important area.

 

The ability to anticipate changes and adapt strategies accordingly will be the hallmark of astute deal-making in an improving South African environment. 

​

Toerien is a Corporate Finance Transactor and Roux is Head of Corporate Solutions | RMB Corporate Finance.